Browsing Posts in Talent Strategy

Worth Their Weight In...

by Beth Rounds and Lock Collins, Cambiar Partners

Over the past year, the Cambiar partners have been writing, presenting and blogging about The Winds of Change within the MR industry.  Leading companies across the value chain are listening, evaluating business models and setting strategy for the future.  In addition, new entrants, many from outside our industry, are adding to the mix as well as challenging the status quo.  With all the change happening, executives are also realizing that their talent needs are changing.  Joan Lewis, Global Consumer and Market Knowledge Officer, P&G, said in the recent ESOMAR Global Market Research Report, “the element of research that will have to change faster is the profile of people – people who can show integrated thinking, courage and leadership, with less emphasis on back-room analysis or sales. …what we need are more talented people who can build the industry.”  We agree! Where in the past the individual project was king, now the relationship dominates. Corporations expect their business partners to know the business, bringing a holistic array of information to bear on the issue at hand.

All this is good, but are MR executives really embracing this “New Talent for A New Age”concept?  I asked Lock Collins, Cambiar’s Human Resources Practice Leader to weigh in on the topic.

Beth: In the area of human resources and talent, what do MR executives want these days?

Lock:  Clearly clients are looking for  those unique individuals with grounding in market research combined with the ability to understand and discuss marketing with senior management the key business issues that they face.  In our industry, that’s a rare combination. Of course, they need to have a track record of success and must be passionate about the industry.

Also, it seems that we’re moving away from the traditional “hunter-farmer” models with companies structuring around account managers that “have it all”.  Desirable candidates can listen to a client’s problem, develop solutions, oversee the project team and provide insights.  These people are truly the “renaissance men/women” of the market research industry.  Add on top of this, individuals will need to have a POV on the New MR world and be story tellers.  This is a tall order for most!

Beth: Are clients starting to hire specialists or mostly generalists?

Lock: Right now, I think MR firms are still looking for generalists, especially at the account management level.  We’ve had discussions with firms regarding their interest in hiring researchers outside traditional marketing and business channels.  For example, some companies have hired graphic designers to support their reporting and presentations, and others are experimenting with hiring individuals that understand story telling — journalists for example.  I can see this trend picking up steam in the next couple of years as the new modalities gain acceptance.

Beth: No company can afford a wrong hire.  What recommendations do you have for improving a company’s success rates?

Lock: Managers have to be serious about interviewing and selection.  All too often hiring is treated way too casually.  There are a number of best practices in this area that I’d be happy to share at a later point, but in my experience great managers are looking for candidates who possess those intangible behaviors that will lead to success in the position.   We’re doing more to help our clients focus on the desired behaviors and characteristics, as well as a strong organizational fit vs. the traditional list of research methodologies and knowledge of the end-client’s industry.

Beth: On the flip side – it still seems like a competitive employment market.  Do you see any trends in what employees or prospects want from an employer?

Lock: Our sense is that individuals with 0- 5 years of experience may be operating in a traditional employment environment, not much different than twenty years ago.  At the more senior levels, where our practice is focused, candidates are consistently looking for a few things:

  • Autonomy and the ability to develop solutions in an unconventional way – not the way “we’ve always done it”.  With this autonomy comes a blurring of work and personal life, with individuals wanting to working on their own schedule in their own location.  Some of our clients prefer to have employees engaged in the day-to-day activities of an office.  We’re finding that more and more of our clients, however, are expressing the flexibility for senior level employees to be located anywhere.
  • Among our candidates, we are also noticing the desire to walk away from the large established research suppliers. Many more are now attracted to entrepreneurial opportunities in which they can “build something”.
  • Finally, senior candidates are not looking for a job.  They are interested in moving a vision forward and financially sharing in the results.

Beth: There are a lot of recruiters out there.  What makes Cambiar’s Talent Practice different?

Lock: As part of any corporate strategy, executives look to the major trends that are affecting clients and research companies alike. The MR industry is poised for great change and we are starting to see how those macro trends play in to the types of talent that we will require in the future.  As we all know, a successful business strategy can’t stop at a new and improved sales and marketing plan. To borrow a concept from Jim Collins of Good to Great fame, having the right talent  in the right seats on the right bus is critical to the success of any organization.

Results from The Cambiar Future of Research Study

by Ian Lewis, Partner

Cambiar recently unveiled findings from “The Cambiar Future of Research Study” at the AMA Research & Strategy Summit in Chicago.  The study looked out to 2020 and heard from 160 corporate researchers who have a wide range of experience, level and industry backgrounds.  We also heard from research company executives, and I will be presenting the integrated results at the CASRO Annual Conference October 19 in Palm Beach, Florida.

What did we learn?

Researchers are expecting major change.  Almost 60% of corporate research VPs expects major transformation by 2020; 70% expect this to be evident by 2015.  One quarter of corporate researchers expects that the leading research company in 2020 does not exist today!  Another one fifth expects that Google or Facebook will be leading the pack.

Corporate researchers will be consultants more than researchers.  Virtually all corporate researchers believe that successful market researchers will have great consulting skills.  This trend is already manifesting: Best Buy, Novartis, Pepsi and Starbucks have all recruited former BCG or McKinsey consultants to leadership positions.

We’ll have global responsibilities.  Researchers believe that growth in MR spending will be driven from outside USA/Europe, and that jobs will have global or international responsibilities.

The future is about listening, measuring emotion, and mining knowledge.   Nine out of ten researchers believe consumer listening will lead to major changes.  Emotion measurement is expected to be part of the standard toolkit, although the jury is still out as to whether neuroscience and biometrics will be commonplace.  Three in four researchers expects that marketing issues will be addressed by mining existing knowledge rather than initiating a project. 

What about today? How are we doing?

Not well. Only 25% of corporate researchers are “very satisfied” with the role of their department.  We asked about barriers to success, and heard some fundamental issues.

What is the top Barrier?  “We are not operating as Thought Partners” (defined by Market Research Executive Board as an ongoing consultant to the business, an informed business partner, opportunity identifier or strategic thought partner) There is a huge gap today between corporate researchers’ desired role as a Thought Partner (92% want this), and their actual role (37% have a Thought Partner role). Six in ten have an “in the trenches” role; they are brought in too late, treated as order takers, or have business teams that want to control information.

How can we become Thought Partners? Support from the top is a key enabler. Given that many research departments are operating in an “in the trenches” mode today, there is a need to negotiate a “Management Contract” with senior management about how research should engage and operate with the business. [I discuss this in High-Impact Research: The New Strategic Partner. Research World, March 2010].   

The TOP enabler is for research to identify and communicate insights that deliver business impact, going beyond the “What?” and “So What?” to the “Now What?”  This requires a different way of working, with a focus on collaboration, synthesis and storytelling.

What are the training needs? Top of the list are the journey from researcher to consultant; and storytelling and other impactful communication skills.  Additional training needs include synthesis skills, development of rich insights, and learning about new research modalities.

So, what should corporate research leaders do?  Here’s a short “to do” list:

  1. Become a great consultant (or risk being replaced by one!)
  2. Negotiate a Management Contract to enhance your role
  3. Evaluate staff capabilities and implement training for consulting skills, storytelling, synthesis and insights for impact
  4. Leverage and integrate new research modalities
  5. LEAD!!  A sea change is coming

I would enjoy hearing from you.  Contact me at Ian@consultcambiar.com.

The Winds of Change – The Future of Staffing

by Ian Lewis and Lock Collins, Cambiar Partners

Now Hiring Management Consultants

The future of client market research departments lies with management consultants, polymaths* and specialists. Management consultants will lead client market research (MR) departments, satisfying C-suite demands for MR that ‘gets the business’, is effective with senior management, is future-focused and is a driver of innovation and growth. Polymaths will have the conceptual thinking ability and agility to integrate and leverage the myriad sources of information (what Simon Chadwick referred to as the New Modalities and the River in his Nov 21 “The Winds of Change” blog), identifying insights that give competitive advantage. Specialists will bring deep analytic capabilities and knowledge that unlocks fresh insights for polymaths to leverage.

Why do we say this?  And what does is mean for staffing of the future, in client market research departments and in research companies?

Three major forces are driving change in future staffing needs, and market research is rapidly approaching what Andy Grove of Intel called a “strategic inflection point” in his famous book Only the Paranoid Survive.

Force 1:  Senior management in client companies is demanding that MR moves from being an operation that largely does validation and tactical research to one that is a strategic partner in driving innovation and growth.

Force 2:  A river of information beyond traditional market research data is rapidly coming on stream (e.g. social media, web analytics, and location-based data); information synthesis and knowledge management will become critical to the survival of MR departments, and will offer huge opportunity for innovative research companies.

Force 3:  There has never before been a time of so much innovation in MR tools.  There’s neuroscience, biometrics, eye-tracking, social media analytics, online ethnographies, virtual shopping, “digividuals”, and more.

Force 1 drives the need for people with management consulting skills, and for polymaths (think Leonardo da Vinci and Theodore Roosevelt).  Force 2 drives the need for polymaths and analytical specialists.  Force 3 drives the need for a wide range of specialists.  The vast majority of specialists will work for research companies.

Take heed of the winds of change, and take these three steps now.  1) Evaluate your structure and staff against the new needs, 2) Design a training program that addresses key capability gaps, and 3) Restructure as needed, and hire to fill gaps that cannot be filled with training.

*A polymath (Greek: polymaths, “having learned much” is a person whose expertise spans a significant number of different subject areas. [Source: Wikipedia]

Connect with Ian Lewis or Lock Collins